The
graph of the world’s total primary energy supply represents the su of
production and imports, subtracting exports and storage changes. This figure
ignores conversion efficiency, thus the forms of energy with poor conversion
efficiency such as coal and gas are overstated unlike efficiently converted
sources such as hydroelectricity.
Based
on the graph of the World’ total primary energy supply from 1971 to 2013, there
has been an increase in the energy supply of all of the different supplies
represented by the graph, including coal, oil, natural gas, nuclear, hydro,
biofuels, and waste. However, there has been a far greater increase in the
supplies of biofuels and waste, natural gas, nuclear, and hydro energy supply.
This means that the world is focusing in on moving towards these sources of
energy as our main supplies. In the past, oil has been the largest energy
supply for the world because the amount of energy supplied of each type of fuel
is based on the difference between its highest and lowest values on the y-axis
of the graph for that given year. Thus oil had approximately a 2,100 Mtoes
which is 2,100*10^6 million tons of oil equivalent. One mtoe is the amount of
energy released in burning 1 ton of crude oil. Meanwhile sources such as
natural gas had a supply of approximately 500 Mtoes in 1971. In 2013, the
supplies of oil and natural gas were at 4,000 Mtoes and 3,000 Mtoes
respectively. Thus there was a 1,900 Mtoe increase in oil 2,500 Mtoe increase
in natural gas supplies. This verifies the projections that our future energy
usage will follow in the same direction as our energy supplies, away from the
use of inefficient fuels such as oil and coal and towards the use of natural
gas and nuclear energy.
Advanced
economies such as the USA and Japan have a large percentage of the world GDP
while developing economies such as China and India have very low percentages of
the world’s GDP, even though they have larger percentages of the world’s
population; 20% and 17% for China and India respectively, while the US and
Japan have 4.6% and 2.0% of the world’s population respectively. However, it
seems that according to the data in table 1.5, the world energy consumption for
these countries is not based on the percent of world GDP that they hold, but
rather on the percent of world population that they hold. China’s percent of
world population is 20% and India’s was at 17% in 2001 while the rest of the
countries listed in the table including the United States and Japan had less
than 5% of the world’s population.
The
final figure that we are given, figure 1.7, allows us to note that the linear
trend line between the energy consumption per capita is directly proportional
to the GNP per capita. Although it seems that the USA and Japan are almost
outliers in this figure for they have the greatest deviation from the trend
line of the figure.
With
the trend of a directly proportional world energy consumption and world
population, it can be projected that the world energy consumption of China and
India will increase exponentially as their percent of the world GDP increases
over time.
According
to the quiz taken online, my total gas emissions currently are at the following
levels: 25 tons of CO2 eq per year while the average per person in the US is 27
tons of eq/ year and the world average is 5.5 tons of CO2 eq/year. According to
the quiz taken online, my total projected gas emissions 20 years into the
future are at the 21 tons of CO2 eq per year. Although my personal gas
emissions are projected to decrease only by a little bit over the next 20
years, it is still over 19.5 and 15.5 tons more than the world average which is
rather high in my opinion. It’s still lower than the US average so I believe
the fact that my high values are due to the lifestyle that living in the United
States entails. I believe that no matter where I live in the united states, my values
will be far closer to the US average than the world average.
No comments:
Post a Comment